![gps pathfinder office not measuring distance gps pathfinder office not measuring distance](https://forums.garmin.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/431/EA053EA5_2D00_B680_2D00_41B9_2D00_A616_2D00_B2B16D7D8CC9.jpeg)
- #Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance how to
- #Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance full
- #Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance software
- #Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance Offline
And that still doesn't fix the problem of having to create a new base station for every survey. I could set up a base station at the 1/2 way point (so km8) and carry the radio with me which would extend base coverage but I still don't think I could get a distance of 8km from the base station. It will also be impossible to obtain a set base because the glacier is always moving which would mean every glacier survey I do would require a new base station. Running up and down the glacier to continuously move the base just isn't practical. The out of camp surveying that I will need to do will be on a glacier that is approximately 16km long. At some point you might just have to set up a base, or do some static ahead of time and break out the robot. > There are RTK bridges that can help you extend RTN beyond cell coverage somewhat. hard to recommend anything without knowing exactly what kind of "staking" you are supporting. But this is no where near what RTK can do, and even at that RTK is of course not suitable for certain precisions. if it is purely relative work then no worries. In that mode you are in ITRF/IGS ref framework, so you'd have to do a little localization to match whatever local system you want to work on. If you lose view you need to re-converge which might only take a few minutes. 10-15 minutes convergence and you can get as good as a few centimeters, and as long as you keep view of the RTX-deliver sats, you can maintain that. But the caveats are: you have to pay a subscription (ask your dealer) and you have to have one of the geosynchronous sats that deliver the RTX messages in view (there can be short gaps). > There is a RTX-PPP option for that rover, that will work without cell coverage or a base. Sometimes it can be a s tight as a foot, but with outliers running into multiple meters, and with the vertical being far worse. > With SBAS (I am assuming WAAS only) you are likely only to get a meter at best.
![gps pathfinder office not measuring distance gps pathfinder office not measuring distance](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/237608012_JP47_MEASUREMENTS_OF_THE_DIURNAL_CYCLE_OF_TEMPERATURE_HUMIDITY_WIND_AND_CARBON_DIOXIDE_IN_A_SUBALPINE_FOREST_DURING_THE_CARBON_IN_THE_MOUNTAINS_EXPERIMENT_CME04/links/00463526fd0e0cfc15000000/largepreview.png)
Rover options – change the survey type to RT differential and Broadcast format = SBAS Set up a new survey style – Style type = GNSS. I contacted my suppliers tech support (numerous times) and their suggestion for surveying using just the rover with post processing was the following: I had a one day crash course on the R10 but it really just covered the basics with everything set up and ready to go.
![gps pathfinder office not measuring distance gps pathfinder office not measuring distance](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/trimble-proxt-user-guide-130513160104-phpapp01/95/trimble-pro-xt-user-guide-24-638.jpg)
I completely understand what your saying and i'm definitely in a bit over my head.
#Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance Offline
I can't recommend any via this forum, but if your dealer does not deliver, contact me offline and I can point to some good training resources. If they don't, there are dealers elsewhere that have great online tutorials and even provide training. Folks here would have to write tens of thousands of word keystroke-by-keystroke instructions, and that would not completely solve your dilemma.
#Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance how to
> I really encourage folks to put the pressure on the folks that sell them their gear to provide guidance in how to get the best from said gear. Otherwise it might be a case of buying a Formula One racecar to deliver pizza's in suburbia at posted speeds.
#Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance full
Your R10, and other top tier rovers are capable of a many great things, but it takes a lot of skill to take full advantage of the capabilities. There is a premium on learning how to use the more sophisticated tools. > But the issue is deeper than that post-processing of very few observations to yield the best possible results is far more sophisticated than tools designed to automatically digest resource grade observations. > Just about every top tier dual-frequency rover can collect observations in static, rapid-static, PPK, etc and these can be collected (or converted to) plain old Rinex. You should look into something with a little more user control over how baselines are processed, and adjusted like TBC, or LGO et al. PFO, or any equivalent one-button post-processing tool is only designed for, and only capable of resource-grade positioning results. > The issue is less about the brand, the hardware and data collector than it is about what you are trying to do with it. I would prefer to post process through pathfinder if possible - it easily exports to many of the file types I need
#Gps pathfinder office not measuring distance software
Is there another way to use the R10 with just a rover and achieve decent results? The R10 system is new to me - the Leica I was simply taking out with just a rover (no base station set up) and used the Pathfinder Office software for post processing. > What version of RINEX are you using? Maybe you need to use a higher version to combine the Glonass and GPS observables into a single RINEX. XXg is RINEX Glonass satellite observables? It'll be interesting to see what other people say about that. I don't see how you could possibly do accurate stakeout with an R10 in pure PPK mode collecting data for later post processing only without doing RTK at the same time.